Celestron Review 2026
Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ Review 2026: The Best of Both Worlds?
We tested the Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ for three months under UK skies to find out whether the bigger aperture makes it worth the premium over the LT 70AZ.
Updated 14 September 2026 · Written by the TelescopeReviews.co.uk test team
Quick Verdict
⭐⭐⭐⭐ 4.4/5 — RECOMMENDED
The Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ takes everything that works about the LT 70AZ — the smartphone navigation, battery-free mount, fast setup — and adds a 130mm aperture Newtonian reflector. The result is a telescope that guides you to objects manually while delivering views that the smaller LT 70AZ simply cannot match. For UK beginners who want navigation help with serious aperture, this is the telescope to buy.
- ✅Buy if: You want StarSense navigation with 130mm aperture and do not need motorised tracking
- ❌Skip if: You want automatic tracking — the NexStar 130SLT adds full GoTo motors
Key Specifications
| Optical design | Newtonian reflector |
| Aperture | 130mm |
| Focal length | 650mm |
| Focal ratio | f/5 |
| Mount type | Alt-azimuth (manual) |
| StarSense dock | Yes — smartphone required |
| Eyepieces included | 10mm and 25mm (1.25 inch) |
| Finder | StarSense dock replaces finder |
| Weight | 5.2kg (assembled) |
| Tripod | Aluminium adjustable |
| Smartphone required | Yes — iOS or Android |
| UK warranty | 2 years (Celestron UK) |
Build Quality and Design
The DX 130AZ is noticeably more substantial than the LT 70AZ — the 130mm Newtonian tube is significantly larger and heavier than the 70mm refractor. The all-metal tube feels solid and premium. The aluminium tripod handles the extra weight adequately, with damping times of 2-3 seconds at high magnification — acceptable for this class of telescope.
The StarSense dock fits the same bracket position as on the LT 70AZ. Our test phone fitted securely across all 30 sessions, including three in light rain. The dock mechanism shows no signs of wear after extended testing.
📐 DX 130AZ vs LT 70AZ — Size Reality
- LT 70AZ tube: lightweight, compact
- DX 130AZ tube: 130mm, significantly larger
- Weight difference: LT 70AZ 3.3kg vs DX 130AZ 5.2kg
- Aperture difference: 70mm vs 130mm — 3.4× more light
- Verdict: Noticeably larger but still portable and manageable
StarSense Navigation Performance
The StarSense system on the DX 130AZ performs identically to the LT 70AZ — the same plate-solving technology, same app, same accuracy. The advantage of the DX 130AZ is that once StarSense guides you to an object, the 130mm aperture reveals dramatically more than the 70mm refractor.
| Condition | Attempts | In FOV | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clear calm night | 25 | 24 | 96% |
| Partly cloudy | 15 | 14 | 93% |
| Light rain | 8 | 7 | 88% |
| After moving telescope | 10 | 9 | 90% |
💡 StarSense + 130mm = Real Astronomy
The LT 70AZ shows you objects — the DX 130AZ shows you astronomy. When StarSense guides you to M13 and you see a globular cluster partially resolving into individual stars through 130mm, the experience is qualitatively different from seeing a fuzzy blob through 70mm. The navigation is the same — what you see when you arrive is not.
What We Saw Through the Eyepiece
The Moon ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
At 26x (25mm eyepiece): Full disc with excellent contrast, dramatic terminator shadows.
At 65x (10mm eyepiece): Individual craters to ~4km, mountain peaks, rilles visible.
Verdict: Outstanding — the 130mm mirror delivers significantly more lunar detail than 70mm.
Saturn ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
At 65x: Rings clearly defined, Cassini Division visible on good nights, Titan detectable. StarSense found Saturn in 75 seconds on average.
Verdict: Excellent — tracking manually at 65x is manageable with light finger pressure.
Jupiter ⭐⭐⭐⭐
At 65x: Two main cloud bands, four Galilean moons, Great Red Spot when facing Earth.
At 130x on best nights: Additional banding detail.
Verdict: Very good — significantly better than LT 70AZ at the same magnification.
Orion Nebula (M42) ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
At 26x from Bortle 5: Bright core with extensive nebulosity, Trapezium resolved into four stars clearly and six on best nights.
Verdict: Outstanding — 130mm makes a dramatic difference on deep-sky objects.
M13 Globular Cluster ⭐⭐⭐⭐
At 65x: Fuzzy ball with stars beginning to resolve at edges.
At 130x: Partial resolution — individual stars visible throughout the outer regions.
Verdict: Good — shows why 130mm aperture matters for deep-sky observing.
Andromeda Galaxy (M31) ⭐⭐⭐
At 26x from Bortle 5: Core and inner halo visible.
Verdict: Modest from suburban UK — better from dark sites.
DX 130AZ vs LT 70AZ — Should You Upgrade?
| Feature | DX 130AZ | LT 70AZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aperture | 130mm | 70mm | DX 130AZ |
| Light gathering | 3.4× more | Baseline | DX 130AZ |
| Deep-sky views | Excellent | Modest | DX 130AZ |
| Planetary views | Very good | Good | DX 130AZ |
| Weight | 5.2kg | 3.3kg | LT 70AZ |
| Portability | Good | Excellent | LT 70AZ |
| StarSense accuracy | 96% | 96% | Draw |
| Price | Higher | Lower | LT 70AZ |
| Value for money | Very good | Outstanding | LT 70AZ |
💡 When to Choose Each
Choose LT 70AZ if:
- Budget is tight
- Portability is essential
- Planets and Moon are main targets
- This is a gift for a beginner
Choose DX 130AZ if:
- Deep-sky objects interest you
- Budget allows the premium
- You want a telescope to grow into
- 130mm aperture is the minimum you want to observe seriously
Who Should Buy This Telescope?
✅ YES — Buy the DX 130AZ if:
- StarSense navigation appeals
- 130mm aperture is your minimum
- You do not need motorised tracking
- Budget is between LT 70AZ and NexStar 130SLT
- Cold UK winters concern you (no mount batteries)
- You want to learn the sky while getting navigation help
❌ NO — Consider alternatives if:
- Motorised tracking is essential → Celestron NexStar 130SLT
- Budget is tight → StarSense Explorer LT 70AZ
- Maximum aperture matters → Sky-Watcher Heritage 130P
- Astrophotography is the goal → ZWO Seestar S50
Alternatives to Consider
Celestron StarSense Explorer LT 70AZ
Lower price, lighter weight. Better for beginners on a budget or those prioritising portability.
Celestron NexStar 130SLT
Same 130mm aperture with full motorised GoTo tracking. Finds and follows objects automatically.
Sky-Watcher Heritage 130P FlexTube
Same 130mm aperture, lower price, more portable. Better value for manual observing without navigation assistance.
Frequently asked questions
🏆 Our Final Verdict
The Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ occupies a unique position in the UK telescope market — more aperture than the LT 70AZ, less automation than the NexStar 130SLT, and no mount batteries at any temperature. For UK observers who want StarSense navigation with serious aperture, it is the right choice. The 130mm parabolic mirror delivers views that sustain long-term interest — and StarSense ensures you spend your rare clear UK nights observing, not searching.
Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 4.4/5
Recommended for: Intermediate beginners, observers who want navigation help with serious aperture, cold-weather UK observers
Disclosure: We tested this telescope independently. Links to Amazon are affiliate links — we earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Part of the Celestron range — also see our best telescope for beginners guide.
At a glance
4.4/5
Recommended for UK beginners who want aperture
- ✓ 130mm aperture with StarSense
- ✓ No mount batteries needed
- ✓ Strong deep-sky views
- ✕ No motorised tracking
- ✕ Needs occasional collimation